GO TO
VISITOR
INFORMATION
TOWN COUNCILLORS
names and addresses
TOWN COUNCIL
WEBSITE
(archive)
LOCAL
CHIPPY NEWS
IS NOW HERE
All phone numbers on this site are code unless shown otherwise.
OTHER CHIPPY WEB SITES
Comments, Ideas,
Criticisms, Articles
Finding us
A "secret" road
Description
Map of Chippy
Stay in Chippy
Stay nearby
Holiday Cottages
Things to see
Chippy's Pubs
Pubs Nearby
Restaurants
Some History
LOCAL
NEWS PAGE
LOCAL WEATHER
STATION TOWN INFO Census Info
BUS & RAIL
CLUBS & SOCIETIES
BUSINESS DIRECTORY
OUR MP
LOCATIONS DRINKING/EATING
Visit the Theatre Website
CATCH UP WITH
PREVIOUS
ARTICLES
NEWS STORY
INDEX
|
|
GIVE US A BREAK! NO MORE HOMES UNTIL THERE ARE SOME MORE JOBS IN THE TOWN
|
When Parker Knoll closed three years ago with the loss of 400 jobs and permission was given for 120 houses on the site, there was a fierce outcry that if the jobs and homes in the town were not kept in some kind of balance, it was obvious that Chippy would increasingly become a commuter place - dead during the day as working folk headed off to Oxford, Banbury, Witney and even Swindon and Cheltenham. The Planners solemnly promised us that five acres of land at Parker Knoll would be developed as industrial units - and moreover Wimpey would not be allowed to sell their homes until detailed marketing plans for these units had been agreed and finalised. This has turned out to be complete eyewash. Wimpey have been stalling the planners for three years and no plans have been agreed as far as anybody knows. The employment land is said to be under offer - for the third time. The whole thing is turning into a scandal. Two years ago a Town Partnership was formed to get funding for employment-generating schemes and to produce a marketing plan for the town. Absolutely nothing has been done. When the Local Plan was reviewed by an Inspector he refused to allow the allocation of Tank Farm (left) for residential use precisely because this would adversely affect the homes/employment balance in the town. Now Gleesons want to build 50 "affordable" homes there - claiming its a windfall site and comes under the "rural exceptions" policy. That policy was intended for "small scale" developments in villages - not a huge development like the one proposed, which would extend the borders of the town and wreck some attractive open countryside. But even more importantly it continues this stupid cycle of more homes - fewer jobs. Worse still is another application - just in - to build 24 flats at Station Mill. Eighteen months ago permission was refused for the change of use for the converted Mill owned by Solar Jewellery from an employment site to residential. However in an attempt to help the firm's difficult financial position they were granted permission to build some houses at the back of the Mill with their assurance they would stay in commercial operation in the town. But Solar simply sold up and left. Now the new owner is back wanting to convert the old Solar building into flats. This is a high density development with two separate blocks, a courtyard and underground parking. All one and two bedroom flats with 40% affordable housing. But who needs more one bedroom affordable flats These haven't been in any demand by Chippy people at Blissfield Gardens. What everybody seems to want is an affordable three-bedroom house with a small garden. The developers say the old Solar building has been on the market for eighteen months with no takers. (Only one company was interested says the application. That was Ceta and as we all know they were offered a cut price piece of land by the County Council). The application also says astonishingly that it would be unviable to modernise the old Mill as a commercial building. To be competitive it would have to be converted into small scale IT-friendly units like the ones planned for the Parker Knoll site. Great story - except who has guaranteed that anything like that is actually going to be built at Parker Knoll. They know more than we do. It is complete madness to go on building flats on employment sites. More homes - fewer jobs. We must all resist this trend as strongly as possible. Otherwise the character and vitality of the town will be ruined for ever. |
MORE DELAY FOR ENTERPRISE CENTRE
|
TO GINA BURROWS; I am writing to you as my representative on the Town Partnership. It was stated at the Town Council on Monday that an answer was expected at the Partnership Meeting yesterday about plans for the sale and development of the five acres of employment land at the Parker Knoll site. This would allow the preparation of a grant application for an Enterprise Centre to go ahead. I am sure you are aware of how much interest and concern there is about this issue in the town - particularly since we have been told on at least three separate occasions over the last year that an answer was expected within the next week or so. I would like your reassurance that firm imformation about the employment land was forthcoming and I would be grateful if we could be told what it was. GERRY ALCOCK
TO GERRY ALCOCK: At last night's meeting Will reported that negotiations were still continuing between Wimpey and the potential buyer. They should have exchanged in December but a legal problem arose and now their anticipated exchange date is in February. This is hugely frustrating but is in the hands of two sets of lawyers. Those representing the Partnership in this and WODC are keeping the pressure on but there is a limit to what can be done to move it further any faster. It seems both parties are keen to complete but meanwhile this is immensely frustrating for us all and it is understood how the patience of some of the community is being tried. Nevertheless, other work concerned with the bid to the Market Towns fund is being carried out so that we will be able to move straight on once things are settled and Catherine Chater reported that she was meeting with Brian Spragg who is overseeing the SEEDA money in Oxfordshire, that she has the application form and is doing some of the preparatory work for the bid. I'm afraid this will not constitute 'firm information' but that is as firm as it gets at this point which is a shame. It does seem to be a very long game. GINA BURROWS
|
THIS ENTERPRISE CENTRE HAS BECOME A SCANDAL Whats the latest excuse
|
We are told that a grant application to SEEDA for an Enterprise Centre is being held up because Wimpey have spent the last year "trying" to sell the 5 acres of employment land on the Parker Knoll site to another developer. Until this is finalised nothing can be done. Despite this delay last September the Partnership recruited a Programme Manager - at considerable cost - specifically to make grant applications. She now seems to be twiddling her thumbs - very expensively - so this whole matter has become urgent and now needs some straight answers.
JAN 18th TO GINA BURROWS; I am writing to you as my representative on the Town Partnership. It was stated at the Town Council on Monday that an answer was expected at the Partnership Meeting yesterday about plans for the sale and development of the five acres of employment land at the Parker Knoll site. I am sure you are aware of how much interest and concern there is about this issue in the town - particularly since we have been told on at least three separate occasions over the last year that an answer was expected within the next week or so. I would like your reassurance that firm information about the employment land was forthcoming and I would be grateful if we could be told what it was. GERRY ALCOCK
JAN 18th TO GERRY ALCOCK: At last night's meeting Will reported that negotiations were still continuing between Wimpey and the potential buyer. They should have exchanged in December but a legal problem arose and now their anticipated exchange date is in February. This is hugely frustrating but is in the hands of two sets of lawyers. Those representing the Partnership in this and WODC are keeping the pressure on but there is a limit to what can be done to move it further any faster. It seems both parties are keen to complete but meanwhile this is immensely frustrating for us all and it is understood how the patience of some of the community is being tried. I'm afraid this will not constitute 'firm information' but that is as firm as it gets at this point which is a shame. GINA BURROWS
18th MARCH TO GINA BURROWS Sorry to keep on about this but I would like an answer. On January 18th you wrote to me in connection with Wimpey's sale of 5 acres of employment land at Parker Knoll........" now their anticipated exchange date is in February" It is now the middle of March. Can you please tell me what has happened GERRY ALCOCK
Monday morning.......No reply yet from Gina but Hilary Biles has let us have her comments..........I too am hoping it will be sorted soon and that we may get a positive announcement on Wednesday ........... (presumably at the Partnership Forum. Well lets hope so! If it happens it would be news manipulation with a vengeance but it could still be worth turning up to this meeting to make sure the announcement is actually made)
Gina responded later: As far as I am aware the situation is as before - negotiations are being carried out between commercial companies and progress is being made. It is very frustrating for everyone not to have more information and for the whole process to take so long but I'm sure you and I are not alone in feeling this frustration. Hopefully, when things are resolved, there will be something to celebrate. In the meantime we just have to trust and be patient. I told the mayor that my patience was exhausted and I had no basis whatsoever for trusting the District Council.
Then Hilary rang to say she didn't know anything either. She was only "hoping" for an announcement. Suspicions mounted at the Town Council meeting when all the Tory County and District councillors failed to turn up. Some of us reckoned they must be holding a "spin" meeting somewhere to try and work out how they were going to persuade the town that a Tesco supermarket was yet another masterpiece of Conservative planning. This would all be funny if it wasn't Chippy jobs we were talking about!
Needless to say there was no announcement about any of this at the Partnership Meeting on Wednesday
|
Psst.....TESCO ARE COMING
|
A fellow councillor rang me up to tell me that he had heard from another councillor (who generally knows about these things) that there's a really strong rumour around town that Tesco have bought the 5 acres of employment land at the Parker Knoll site. Its not surprising that as the District Council Planners keep failing to deliver any definite news about what is happening the rumour mill will take over. This one started when a local business man who would rather like to set up a car showroom on London Road called in at the Wimpey Site Office to enquire when units would be available. No chance he was told. The employment land has been sold to Tesco. Its over three years since the original planning permission was given. This involved Wimpey having to produce a detailed marketing plan for industrial units on the 5 acres. We were told that marketing of the Wimpey houses could not proceed until this plan was all tied up. (hmmm) It now seems that the only marketing plan Wimpey ever had was to sell the land on to somebody else. We have been told that any new owner would have to accept the plan for industrial units agreed with Wimpey. The story goes that there is an eager buyer but negotiations have been dragging on because of legal problems (see below). What the rumour mill now says is that Tesco have bought the land and will spend a year proving there is no demand for industrial units. Then the planning permission expires and Tesco will re-apply this time for "retail" use - which is perfectly OK. They will claim they are creating 100 jobs. They will probably also sweeten their application with an offer to build (or at least contribute a few million towards) a link road from London Road, through Tank Farm and the School to join up with Burford Road (the so-called Eastern By-Pass mentioned in the County Transport Review). There is then a huge quantity of land ready for residential in-filling between the new link road and the existing town boundary - owned by Oxfordshire County Council with options already sold to developers. The cash registers will be ringing out for everybody. Lovely jubbly. The first application for residential development at Tank Farm has already been made. Our town centre will end up like Stow - full of shops selling pots and casserole dishes. It is absolutely vital that we receive reassurance about these 5 acres of employment land as a matter of great urgency. We want the employment units which were promised - not a Tesco supermarket.
|
GREAT NEWS ABOUT THE 5 ACRES
OF EMPLOYMENT LAND AT PK
|
Excellent news that Wimpey have at last exchanged contracts on the 5 acres of land allocated for employment at the Parker Knoll site. Chunky Townley tells us in the Forum that the site is being purchased by Starleen Investments Limited, administered by Standard Bank, Jersey, with the intention of developing in the region of 85,000 sq. feet of B1 space. Hopefully this will be a mix of industrial units and office space as agreed three years ago in a detailed Marketing Plan submitted to the West Oxfordshire planners. We are told that the development team already have experience operating in West Oxfordshire through the development of the Blenheim Office Park in Long Hanborough.
The Chipping Norton site will be marketed by Meeson Williams who recently produced a review of prospects for commercial property in Oxfordshire - including this encouraging forecast.....The trend for relocations to less well established business locations will continue. We believe that opportunities still exist in some of the the secondary rural and market towns which will continue to see an increase in occupier demand, such as Faringdon, Carterton, Wantage, Thame, Chipping Norton and Woodstock. All of these towns have the potential to provide a good business infrastructure.
Now that this ownership issue has been settled, it should at last be possible for an agreement to be reached about premises on the site for a new Enterprise Centre and for a proposal for grant funding to be submitted to SEERA. Congratulations to the West Oxfordshire planners for coming through with their side of the deal. Now its over to the Partnership to get cracking.
|
PLANS FOR INDUSTRIAL UNITS HAVE NOW BECOME AN "OFFICE PARK"
YET ANOTHER BROKEN PROMISE
|
In the last few years I have sat through many discussions about the 5 acres of employment land at Parker Knoll. There has never - in my view - been the slightest doubt that what was being promised were "industrial units" and " workshops". The marketing Plan agreed three years ago talked abut a "mix of units". We were expecting places suitable for small engineering companies, fabric and furniture makers , electronics designers - and - who knows - even the odd Formula 1 component maker. After all, the whole point was try and lure back to work in Chippy some of the skilled and semi-skilled workers who had been left high and dry by the Parker Knoll closure and to try and tap into the fantastic pool of skilled motor engineering talent in the area. And in any case there was already plenty of office space available at Cromwell Park.....and a distinct shortage of office workers. Ceta could never recruit enough people.
Now a design statement has appeared for the development of this employment land - distributed yesterday at the Town Council. A few quotes: "An outline planning application was made to redevelop this site for B1 use and in particular Office use". (Section 1.2) "Provision of 3-storey buildings are acceptable on the site" WODC Planning advice quoted (Section 7.1) "It is proposed the new office park is designed...." (Section 11.1).
A plan shows 14 square and rectangular buildings surrounded by car parking and with no serious landscaping features densely packed into the site in a grid. If they are to provide the proposed 86,000 sq feet of space ("necessary to be viable") there will probably need to be two or three stories.
It looks as if what will be built is offices - pure and simple. Another Cromwell Park but much less attractive and without the space between buildings. Is this really what's planned Perhaps the Partnership will tell us on Wednesday evening (18th July). Is there really such a demand for office space The Town Partnership spent 10,000 on a "feasibility" study for the site's development two years ago which supposedly established levels of demand. That study has never been published. Perhaps the time for publication has come.
Councillor Keith Greenwell writes:
1 Chipping Norton already has a surfeit of office accommodation with space available on Cromwell Park and more to become available once CETA relocate to their new premises. What is required is small industrial premises that will foster small businesses employing say up to 10 and providing jobs for the school leavers who want practical, hands-on jobs. The sort of units that exist in Kingham or Crawley Mill and have attracted specialist businesses doing operations like 'light investment casting', 'classic motor cycle restoration' and specialist woodworking.
2 The new business park needs to compliment other business sites in the town. More offices are not going to compliment existing business sites. Why are some of the ex employees from PK that wanted to start upholstery businesses now using small factory premises in places like the Wychwoods Quite simply because, when you ask them they tell you they would have preferred to stay in Chippy but, there were no suitable premises available at rents they could afford within CN. We have exported jobs and skills to other areas of West Oxfordshire and nothing in this proposaL will bring them back!
I consider that the Town Council should make strong representations to WODC on the above lines and press for planning permission to be granted only when it includes industrial units.
|
CHIPPING Norton's long awaited Enterprise Centre on the former Parker Knoll site is closer to becoming a reality. Outline plans for the centre, set to provide business incubation units plus facilities for existing businesses in the town, are close to being finalised by commercial developers Starleen Investments Ltd who bought the site last year. These will then be submitted to West Oxfordshire District Council and go out to public consultation.
Chipping Norton District Councillor Robert Townley, who asked the council for an update on the plans, said he was pleased progress was being made. "This will be of great benefit to the town. We have been waiting for it for some time and now it looks as though everything is falling into place. The centre isn't exactly imminent, it'll take all of a year, but it will be a boost to the town." The developers, the company is administered by the Standard Bank of Jersey, are preparing a detailed marketing plan for the centre, which could offer up to 85,000 sq feet of space for small businesses. The centre could include flexible workspace with a wide range of support services not just for tenants but existing businesses too.
|
|